After I compared e-discovery self-collection tools in August, readers asked why I didn't include software delivered over the network or the internet. Sending USB drives to custodians to self-collect data and using network-enabled, remote collection software are two ways to reach the same goal, but with different approaches that aren't easily compared.
I sent five providers a request for information about collecting data relevant to litigation from numerous custodians who work outside of a central office location. I specified that the collection should be conducted over the network or internet without sending custodians USB drives.
AccessData, BIA, Guidance Software, and PinPoint Labs responded, describing how their network-enabled products provide real-time management tools to monitor and report on multiple collections — which are not available when you simply deliver a hard drive. With network software, reports during collection can be viewed and downloaded in Microsoft's Excel or .csv format.
To Continue Reading: Click Here
------------------------------------------------------
Source: law.com
By: Sean Doherty
I sent five providers a request for information about collecting data relevant to litigation from numerous custodians who work outside of a central office location. I specified that the collection should be conducted over the network or internet without sending custodians USB drives.
AccessData, BIA, Guidance Software, and PinPoint Labs responded, describing how their network-enabled products provide real-time management tools to monitor and report on multiple collections — which are not available when you simply deliver a hard drive. With network software, reports during collection can be viewed and downloaded in Microsoft's Excel or .csv format.
To Continue Reading: Click Here
------------------------------------------------------
Source: law.com
By: Sean Doherty
No comments:
Post a Comment